• Attorneys learn from and hire medical professionals to help with their cases.
  • Physicians are compensated for their input on medical-related legal cases.
  • The whole process takes only few minutes.

For Medical Professionals

Get compensated for your input on medical-related legal cases.
Advantages for Medical Professionals

For Attorneys

Learn from and hire medical professionals to help with your cases.
Advantages for Attorneys

Are you a Physician? Refer a Colleague to Kalivar and get rewarded with $300 the first time your referral is retained by a lawyer! Sign up or Log in to start referring Experts to Kalivar!

Active Cases

Surgery of the Hand (Orthopaedic Surgery)

Comments are accepted only from Surgery of the Hand (Orthopaedic Surgery) experts.

56yo F has trigger release on multiple fingers, complications lead to partial amputation.

Compensation: $120 for each expert. Expert(s) requested: 2 3 days 6 hours left to post comments on this case.
Show less...

Case Overview

Location: FL
56 years old, Female
Past Medical History: HTN
Past Surgical History:

56 year old female with a previous history of carpal, cubital and radial tunnel release as well as previous trigger finger releases.

Recently undergoes WALANT left hand index, long and ring finger trigger release on May 17th of 2023. Immediately following the procedure, had severe pain and was developing discoloration and swelling of digits. OP note attached.

PC goes to the ER for pain and swelling. A doppler was performed and showed flow up to the DIP joint. The ER physician contacts the surgeon for guidance and the surgeon elects to see PC in office the next day for eval. No admission or further treatment given. Consult note attached.

PC followed up the next day and the surgeon recommended and performed Phentolamine injections to the index and middle finger bases. While monitoring her post injection, PC continued to have extreme pain and ischemic changes to the digits. She was sent back to the emergency room for further evaluation and admission.
During this admission, an angiogram was performed which revealed hyperemia of the second and fourth digit with minimal to no flow at the distal tips. They attempted thrombolysis with no success. She was started on Eliquis and was instructed to follow up with the specialist for arterial duplex in one month.

PC elected to have a second opinion from a different facility in which they diagnosed her with tissue necrosis to the left index and ring finger. They theorize that it could have been due to the digital nerve block. This provider also performed a debridement and burn dressings. 3 days after debridement, PC continued to develop excruciating pain and was taken to the or for excision and kerecis placement.

She was monitored for approximately 1 month and it was determined that the distal phalangeal segment of the index finger was to be amputated. A below DIP joint amputation was performed in June 2023.

In the subsequent year, PC developed hand neuromas, difficulty with range of motion, severe pain. Had additional graft in September of 2023 which appeared to take and heal well. Despite graft healing, multiple specialists have informed her that a more proximal invitation is possible.

Our concern is the original digital block being performed properly. Also the original emergency room visit when the surgeon was contacted, that Phentolamine should not have been given immediately with possibility of digital ischemia? Appropriate to see the next day?

Please see photos, consult and OP note attached. Thank you. Files:

Closed Cases

Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery

Comments are accepted only from Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery experts.

25yo F dx inappropriate sinus node tachycardia, undergoes thoracoscopic ablation. Has complications, req pacemaker.

Compensation: $120 for each expert. Expert(s) requested: 2
1 Response
Show less...

Case Overview

Location: FL
25 years old, Female
Past Medical History: psych, GI issues, syncope
Past Surgical History: just as mentioned above

25 year old female with diagnosed history of inappropriate sinus tachycardia at the age of 17. Also, does have a significant history of psychological issues including bulimia/eating disorder, PTSD, chronic GI issues. Per the limit of records we have, she underwent EPS in Aug 2018 that was unable to trigger SVT, therefore an ablation was not performed at that time. Was placed on multiple rate control medications, however was intolerant secondary to low blood pressure. Additionally, had another mapping and an ablation in September of 2022. She was once again diagnosed with the inappropriate sinus tachycardia, however unknown etiology behind the possible SVT episodes. Attempted beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, and sodium channel inhibitors without improvement.

There was continued concern due to the fact that she was supposedly always “very symptomatic”. Her symptoms included palpitations, fatigue, inability to perform tasks or work, chest pain and shortness of breath. They occurred with and without activity. There nis mention of psychological etiology.

As a last resort, in December of 2022, underwent right thoracoscopic epicardial ablation of the sinus node region and right atrial wall.

The operative note for that procedure and office notes are attached in screenshots.

Should be noted that prior to the procedure, she was explaining the risks of the operation including possible postoperative pacemaker implantation.

Post-operatively PC continued to have symptoms and requested a second opinion due to worsening and frequent syncopal episodes and her holter monitor reported profound bradycardia with long pauses (apparently new onset).

In June of 2023, approximately 6 months after the epicardial ablation, she required an emergent pacemaker which was an Abbott single-chamber atrial. At this point, the second cardiologist suggested that the ablation was inappropriate and potentially not performed correctly. Was diagnosed with SSS and now has a programmed AAIR. This particular cardiologist removed her from the Propranolol she was given, as she was instructed to take a PRN (he deemed inappropriate), regular pacemaker interrogations. However, informed the PC that there's not much they could do at this point since it seems her sinus note is completely destroyed.

Based on this second opinion, we do have concern that there was an issue with the epicardial ablation. PC never had documented SVT, and all EKG’s available to us show sinus rhythms, except for after the procedure in question. This yielded junctional bradycardia and long pauses, as mentioned above.

We do have very scattered and limited documentation, which explains lack of specific details.

We appreciate your opinions in advance and will answer any questions you have. Files:

1 Response

Rewarded!

Do you believe there might have been medical error?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
4 - Unlikely
That is the reason why ablations are performed, to suppress sinus or nodal activity. The fact that she was bradycardic postop certifies the fact that the ablation was successful

Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
4 - Unlikely
Same as above. One of the “complications” of ablations is excessive suppression of the electrical activity thus necessitating a PPM

What makes you a good expert for this case?

I perform surgical ablations and I’ve been involved in transcatheter ablations as well

How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?

When I do an ablation, I always tell my patients there is a risk of requiring a PPM

Pediatric Infectious Diseases

Comments are accepted only from Pediatric Infectious Diseases experts.

Failure to diagnose and treat CMV infection in a newborn

Compensation: $120 for each expert. Expert(s) requested: 3
3 Responses
Show less...

Case Overview

Location: NY
10 years old, Male
Past Medical History:
Past Surgical History:

This case involves a delivery on 7/16/2012 at 12:33 pm by scheduled repeat C-Section at Hospital A. Apgars were 9/9. Infant was given ABX because the Mom tested positive for Group B Strep. Right after birth he was taken to the regular nursery. He was transferred to the special care nursery later that evening because he was noted to have petechiae on his back, trunk, buttocks and thighs. HC was 11-25 percentile.

Initial hematocrit and platelets were low at 66000 and maternal platelet count was 245,000. Hospital A called for a consult with Hospital B, which recommended a retest. 2nd test the platelets were at 11,000. Infant was transferred to Hospital B for a transfusion and possible IVIG however he was never given transfusions- only was monitored.

He was admitted to Hospital B at 2350 on the day of birth (7/16/2012). Petechiae noted in the chart. Retested at Hospital B on 7/17/12 which was a 57,000; 7/18/12 which was 54,000 and then again on 7/18/12 at 58,000. He was tested again on 7/19/12 and it was 54,0000. He was considered stable except for platelets- no head studies done. At discharge, he was recommended for follow up blood drawn by the pediatrician. At Hospital B he wasn’t given transfusions or IvIg done- only was monitored and had his blood drawn. Not tested for TORCH or any viral infection.

From Discharge (7/18/12 until the child was 4 months)- the mother would complain to the pediatrician, Dr. X that he wasn’t moving like the other kids, not smiling, not grasping, staring spells- Pediatrician did nothing.

At 5 Months of life- the infant had his first convulsive seizure. Pediatrician referred him to a neurologist. MRI was done at Hospital A on 1/4/13.

MRI taken on 1/4/13 IMPRESSION:
1. 1. INCREASED T1 SIGNAL INTENSITY IN THE PERIVENTRICULAR SUBEPENDYMAL
REGION SUSPICIOUS FOR CALCIFICATION.
2. VENTRICULAR DILATATION WITH GLIOTIC CHANGE AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. THERE
IS THINNING OF THE CORPUS CALLOSUM SUSPECTED AS WELL AS SUSPECTED
ABNORMALITY OF MYELINATION WITH THE GIVEN AGE OF THE PATIENT.
3. SUSPECTED PORENCEPHALIC CYST WITHIN THE RIGHT FRONTAL LOBE WITH A
PERIVENTRICULAR PSEUDOCYST WITHIN THE LEFT FRONTAL LOBE.
4. THESE FINDINGS ARE SUSPICIOUS FOR POSSIBLE CONGENITAL CMV. A
NONCONTRASTED CT STUDY MAY BE HELPFUL TO CONFIRM PERIVENTRICULAR
CALCIFICATION.
5. NO DEFINITE FINDINGS TO SUGGEST CEREBELLAR HYPOPLASIA.

After this MRI, CMV is suspected as the cause of the seizures and delays. On 1/11/13 and EEG was done which was abnormal and child started on phenobarbital.

On February 22, 2013, patient was admitted to Hospital A for seizures and then transferred to Children’s Hospital C and the pediatric Neurologist did more MRI’s which showed damage to brain consistent with CMV infection. Records state that CMV is the likely cause of Infant’s problems. Subsequent records all use a dx of congenital CMV.

Child eventually passed away on December 19, 2022 at the age of 10. Prior to his passing, he was diagnosed with right sided weakness, feeding tube dependence, epilepsy, non-verbal, Cerebral Palsy, wheelchair bound, totally dependent of his mother and siblings.

We are seeking an opinion as to whether antiviral medication would have improved the outcome for this child? We believe we have a case for failure to diagnose and treat CMV infection in a new born. Please review and advise if you would be on board with this case.

Additionally could diagnosis referral and treatment by the pediatrician beginning at two weeks after birth have made a difference in the outcome? Are you able to comment on the progression of the child’s brain damage?

The infant was seem by multiple neonatologists during his stay at Hospital B. The admitting neonatologist suspected CMV due to the thrombocytopenia and petechiae but nevertheless did not order any testing. The neonatologists who treated him subsequently through discharge were not concerned with the persistent thrombocytopenia and he was discharged to his pediatrician who also did nothing. Files:

3 Responses

Rewarded!

Do you believe there might have been medical error?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
2 - Extremely Unlikely
1) The case synopsis gives no evidence that the child had CMV in the neonatal period. The differential diagnosis of these radiographic findings is not limited to CMV or even limited to "TORCH" infections. 2) There is essentially no data even today, let alone in 2012, showing that antiviral therapy improves any long term outcome of CMV other than hearing loss.

Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
2 - Extremely Unlikely
As mentioned above, we lack data that therapy for CMV would have changed any of the child's outcomes.

What makes you a good expert for this case?

Pediatric infectious diseases specialist, I see CMV in my clinic, I have numerous scientific publications about congenital CMV epidemiology and policy.

How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?

I see newborns with CMV frequently.

Rewarded!

Do you believe there might have been medical error?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
8 - Very Likely
An infant with petechiae and a platelet count of 11,000 (if real and not spurious) should prompt a workup for TORCH infection including CMV. If urine CMV had been done and had been positive, a head ultrasound should have also been done. This would be standard of care at the time. A pediatric infectious disease specialist should/would also then have been involved.

Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
6 - More Likely Than Not
If congenital CMV with neurological findings had been diagnosed at birth or shortly after, the infant would have received treatment—at least 6 weeks of treatment with IV ganciclovir which was standard of care at that time. We now treat longer and with an oral drug but the studies that showed that was an option and beneficial only came out in 2015. However, treatment for 6 weeks with IV Ganciclovir had only been shown by then to improve hearing outcomes. There was not clear data about neurological outcomes with treatment. So it is not fully clear if treatment would have actually modified this child’s course. That said, it might have. More likely than not it would have based on what we know now about CMV treatment. And so it is quite possible this child would have had a different life course and neurological outcome had he been diagnosed and treated at or just after birth. Additionally, treatment should start within the first 4 weeks of life so there was ample opportunity to go back and correct the initial NICU mistake.

What makes you a good expert for this case?

I am a board certified pediatric infectious disease specialist. I have been an attending physician for 13 years, not including the 6 years in training before that. As a pediatric infectious disease physician, I have evaluated and treated many infants with congenital CMV, both symptomatic and asymptomatic at birth—probably on the order of a couple dozen. I have also been involved in research on CMV and am currently part of a multi-site consortium studying congenital CMV in NY state. This is a very sad case, but one I feel very equipped to handle as an expert witness.

How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?

See above—not infrequently. Congenital CMV occurs in 1/200 live births and infants symptomatic at birth are 10% of those, so about 1/2000 births. I have seen many infants with congenital CMV and treated many as well.

Rewarded!

Do you believe there might have been medical error?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
6 - More Likely Than Not
Thrombocytopenia in a neonate with no other obvious explanation (such as immune disorder, bacterial sepsis, etc) should raise concern for congenital CMV (cCMV) infection and prompt more investigations. If suspected a diagnostic test such as urine or saliva CMV PCR/culture should be sent and if positive treatment may be offered. However, in the absence of diagnostic testing results it is not possible to say with certainty that the clinical symptoms and the poor long-term outcome are caused by cCMV. Even the typical MRI findings are not entirely specific and positive predictive value may be as low as 55% Ref: Radiology. 2004 Feb;230(2):529-36. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2302021459). A full and detailed chart review may identify additional clinical (hearing loss? ocular findings?) and laboratory features (hepatitis? colitis? pneumonitis? other cytopenias?) that may make cCMV infection more or less likely.

Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
6 - More Likely Than Not
If the patient had a cCMV infection that was not identified or treated the medical error of failing to diagnose it would have contributed to the injury but it would an exaggeration to say it caused it. In studies treatment with ganciclovir has reduced the occurrence or severity of long-term sequelae (mainly hearing loss), but overall neurodevelopmental outcome was overall poor even in infants treated with ganciclovir.

What makes you a good expert for this case?

Many (20+) years of experience managing infants with congenital CMV, participation in clinical trial of valganciclovir for infants with cCMV and isolated hearing loss.

How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?

I see several cCMV infections every year, many with milder course of illness, patients with severe disease about 1 per year

Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Comments are accepted only from Cardio-Thoracic Surgery experts.

53yo male undergoes minimally invasive MV replacement w/ bypass (R femoral approach) and has immediate RLE weakness, possible nerve injury

Compensation: $120 for each expert. Expert(s) requested: 2
5 Responses
Show less...

Case Overview

Location: FL
53 years old, Male
Past Medical History: ADHD
Past Surgical History: the MV replacement as mentioned above

53-year-old gentleman who is seen at the emergency room for fatigue and tachycardia. A TEE is performed and he is found to have endocarditis and mitral valve abnormalities. A minimally invasive MV replacement w/ bypass (R femoral approach) is scheduled for approximately 8 days later. This is performed with right groin cannulation and intercostal block. Bypass time was 138 minutes. This was not robotically assisted.

There are no documented complications intraoperatively.

The record we currently have does not have a specific note detailing the cannulation procedure, however it was performed by the cardiothoracic surgeon. We do have an event/medication log from the operation, however we did not see anything directly related to this complaint so it was not included.

We have attached a screenshot of the U/S guidance for the groin access.

Later on that evening post-op, PC has no ability to lift his right leg. There's concern for nerve damage by the surgeon to the femoral nerve, as he also develops a post op seroma to the right groin area. Multiple consultations theorize that the injury is most likely due to the cannulation due to no other discernible explanation, despite multiple assessments and diagnostics (PC was made a stroke alert out of precaution, no findings. Bedside nerve testing, etc). PC claims never had any issues with this leg prior.

He is discharged approximately one week later. He completes a neurology follow up consultation and physical therapy. MRI of the brain and CT show no abnormalities.
9 months postoperatively, PC has an EMG nerve study completed. Results show right perineal, posterior tibial and bilateral sural neuropathy. Also suggestive of peripheral neuropathy. There's a denervation in the right vastus medialis muscle, right femoral neuropathy/lumbar plexopathy and no recovery in the right vastus medialis muscle.

This study is attached for review.

We are looking for an opinion concerning the femoral nerve injury in relation to the cardiac procedure. If you request any additional information or have questions please let us know.

Thank you in advance for your time and opinion. Files:

5 Responses

Do you believe there might have been medical error?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
5 - Less Likely Than Not
Femoral nerve injury is a known complication of femoral cannulatikn which is a standard form of cannulation Error could be present if a hematoma was unrecognized and left alone or if the deficit was diagnosed late

Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
5 - Less Likely Than Not
Depends on the technique of cannulation and carefulness of postop exams

What makes you a good expert for this case?

I have 20 years of cardiac surgery experience and frequently use femoral cannulatikn

How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?

Femoral cannulation is common in my practice

Do you believe there might have been medical error?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
6 - More Likely Than Not
This type of nerve injury and loss of motor function is not a common complication nor is it often even quoted as a rare complication of femoral cannulation. Injury to the femoral nerve and its cause will largely be related to how the femoral cannulation was performed (example percutaneously vs cutdown).

Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
6 - More Likely Than Not
As I previously stated, this is very unusual and unexpected for this complication to occur. The mechanism is hard to explain and will depend on how cannulation was performed and how the femoral vessels were accessed (eg. percutaneously vs open).

What makes you a good expert for this case?

I have been an academic cardiac surgeon in practice for 14 years and am currently division chief at a public, academic institution. I am the director of minimally invasive cardiac surgery at my center and have been performing minimally invasive cardiac surgery for over 10 years including minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. I have performed peripheral femoral cannulation both open and percutaneously dozens of times.

How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?

I have been doing minimally invasive cardiac surgery and valve surgery including minimally invasive mitral valve surgery for over 10 years. I have never encountered this complication in my practice.

Rewarded!

Do you believe there might have been medical error?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
3 - Very Unlikely
Nerve injury is a known complication of groin cannulation. Very large cannuas are inserted through the small groin space. These cannulas have to stay in place for several hours during heart surgery, often causing compression of the adjacent nerves. In addition, even after removal of the cannulas, blood clots can form and cause long term nerve compression. This is the reason nerve injury can occur even if the surgery is performed perfectly.

Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
4 - Unlikely
This kind of nerve injury is common when cannulas are inserted. If ultrasound was used during the insertion (or if an open approach was done), cannulation would have been done under direct visualization and there was a very low chance of insertion injury to adjacent nerves. The nerve injury is not the rsult of insertion but the unfortunate side effects of the large size of cannulas.

What makes you a good expert for this case?

I have been a cardiac surgeeon for over 20 years and have performed over 3,000 open heart surgeries like this one. I am familiar with the procedure and I am able to explain the technical nature of the case to the standard public.

How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?

I encounter mitral valve surgery cases about once a week

Rewarded!

Do you believe there might have been medical error?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
5 - Less Likely Than Not
I would surmise that a medical error is possible, but the facts of the case don't all add up. SOme, but not all, of the clinical and nerve conduction study findings, as well as the timing of onset of clinical deficits, correspond to the timing of right femoral artery cannulation. Femoral nerve injury as a result of needle puncture, or some step in cannulation, is a known complication, albeit uncommon, complication of femoral cannulation (In a study of 9,585 femoral-approach cardiac catheterization procedures performed between 1988 and 1993, Kent et al. reported an incidence of femoral neuropathy of 0.2%. In this study, the incidence was 3.8 per 100,000, which may be an underestimate of the actual occurrence: not all patients were evaluated for signs and symptoms of FN.) The expected deficits of femoral nerve injury would be both sensory (medial thigh) and motor (hip flexion and knee flexion - quadriceps) and possibly thigh adduction. The femoral nerve does not supply the tibial and peroneal nerve as they originate as a branch of the sciatic nerve - so those findings are not consistent with femoral nerve injury. The femoral nerve may be injured by direct trauma, or indirectly as a result of a pseudoaneurysm or hematoma - one would want to rule this out and relieve it if identified.

Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
5 - Less Likely Than Not
Possibly, as some, but not all of the clinical findings are explainable by femoral nerve injury. See above. The quadricep findings may be explainable by femoral nerve injury, but not the peroneal or tibial nerve findings. Also, not clear why patient has not described sensory deficits as this is the most common complication from femoral nerve injury. Possibly, as some, but not all of the clinical findings are explainable by femoral nerve injury. See above. The quadricep findings may be explainable by femoral nerve injury, but not the peroneal or tibial nerve findings. Also, not clear why patient has not described sensory deficits as this is the most common complication from femoral nerve injury.

What makes you a good expert for this case?

18 years in clinical practice, over 1600 groin cannulations as part of TAVI team, board certified aortic surgeon and fellowship in peripheral vascular and endovascular surgery

How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?

Very uncommon complication. Possibly, as some, but not all of the clinical findings are explainable by femoral nerve injury. See above. The quadricep findings may be explainable by femoral nerve injury, but not the peroneal or tibial nerve findings. Also, not clear why patient has not described sensory deficits as this is the most common complication from femoral nerve injury.

Do you believe there might have been medical error?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
3 - Very Unlikely
Cannulation using the femoral artery and vein are commonplace for minimally invasive surgery. The absolute etiology of the nerve damage in this case can be multifactorial and may be difficult to prove. The cannulation itself rarely causes nerve damage. The work-up seems thorough but sounds as if they didn’t isolate the culprit event. Still, the etiology could be stroke, local nerve damage, or perhaps something not worked-up… for instance, has the patient ever had a herniated disk in his back? This may have led to weakness which might not have been noticed prior to surgery and became exacerbated by the cardiac surgery. Nothing presented here seems suspicious for medical negligence or an error in surgical technique.

Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
2 - Extremely Unlikely
There is no clear-cut link between the cannulation and the post-op weakness, as many possibilities can account for this condition. More likely than not, despite the MRI scan, stroke or a pre-existing condition may account for the weakness.

What makes you a good expert for this case?

This case does not seem meritorious.

How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?

I’ve never seen this from cannulation. That’s why a pre-existing condition or stroke seem more likely causes.

Anesthesiology - includes all Subspecialties

Comments are accepted only from Anesthesiology - includes all Subspecialties experts.

56yo has rotor cuff repair, initial supraclavicular block and second rescue block. Develops pneumothorax.

Compensation: $120 for each expert. Expert(s) requested: 2
3 Responses
Show less...

Case Overview

Location: FL
56 years old, Male
Past Medical History: PE/DVT on thinners
Past Surgical History:

56-year-old male was getting a right sided rotator cuff repair in an outpatient setting. Prior to the procedure, the patient received a supraclavicular brachial plexus block that was documented to be ultrasound guided throughout. By all accounts, there were no complications during that time or intraoperatively. Postoperatively, PC continued to have right shoulder pain and a rescue block was ordered. PC was administered 100mcg Fentanyl and the second rescue block was performed (also ultrasound guided). PC’s blood pressure was elevated post-op with an oxygen saturation of 95%. Required 2L N/C as he did eventually desaturate into the 80s. Approximately 1 hour post-rescue block, PC was deemed stable for discharge. It was notated that he was experiencing relief of pain. Last documented vital signs were normal however O2 saturation showed 94% on room air and were approx 30 min prior to leaving the facility

The following evening, PC had slow onset but continued shortness of breath and went to the emergency room. Was found to have a moderate right pneumothorax. PC was treated with a chest tube and was eventually discharged two days later.

PC does not have any physical deficits currently but does claim to have substantial mental anguish from this event.

I have attached various screenshots of documentation of the nerve blocks, time in the PACU and other handwritten notes. We're looking to ensure that the pneumothorax was not preventable and/or the vital signs were sufficient for discharge and did not reflect the possibility of pneumothorax complication.

Appreciate your opinion in advance and please notify with any questions or concerns. Files:

Questions & Answers

Q: We’re images saved
A: Unfortunately, we do not have that information. I would say likely not.

Q: Was the procedure done under general anesthesia in addition to the block, and if so, was patient intervention bated and on the ventilator
A:

3 Responses

Do you believe there might have been medical error?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
5 - Less Likely Than Not
Given the background of the case, I believe that the rescue block was warranted status post the surgery. With the rescue block that was placed, there does carry a risk of a pneumothorax from the procedure. It usually is around 0.5% for those who experienced with an increase to about 5% for those who are slightly less experienced. So although this carries a risk it’s not a necessary causation from the block.

Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
5 - Less Likely Than Not
Although it cannot certainly be proven as a causation, this type of lock can carry as very small risk/sequela of a pneumothorax. This should have been spoken about in the informed consent.

What makes you a good expert for this case?

I am a double board-certified, anesthesiologist and interventional pain management position. I am the program Director for the pain management fellowship program in my institution. Although I wear many different hats and assume many different roles, we see these type of patients almost every day.

How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?

Almost every day. Although we don’t necessarily see pneumothorax, we do participate in these blocks very frequently.

Rewarded!

Do you believe there might have been medical error?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0 1 1 Chart context menu Speedometer 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Highcharts.com
5 - Less Likely Than Not
Although it is relatively uncommon, pneumothorax after supraclavicular has been reported and should be discussed with patient during preop interview and when obtaining consent. Images should be obtained during the procedure and a copy saved to the patient’s medical record

Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?

Created with Highcharts 8.0.0