• How Kalivar Works
  • Our Fees
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Login
  • Sign Up

Expert Information

Currently engaged in clinical practice: Yes

Degree: MD

Specialty / Subspecialty:

  • Ophthalmology

Area of Expertise: Cataract Surgery, LASIK, Refractive Surgery, PRK, Phakic IOL

Year of Medical Training Completion: 2001

City of Practice: Lacey

State of Practice: Washington

Previous Experience As Expert Witness: Yes

Type of Practice: Non-Academic

  • Deposition(s) Given For the Defendant:
  • Deposition(s) Given For the Plaintiff:
  • Testified in a Trial For the Defendent:
  • Testified in a Trial For the Plaintiff:

Available to Review Cases: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Available to Be Deposed: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Available to Testify In Trial: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Training and Additional Credentials

Medical School: -

Year of Completion: -

Residency: -

Year of Completion: -

Fellowship: -

Year of Completion: -

Academic / Leadership Information

Highest Academic/Leadership Position Achieved: -

Current Academic Affiliation: -

Distinguishing Achievements

Awards: -

Number of Publications on PubMed: -

Professional Organizations: -

Fee Schedule

Medical Record Review:

Review of Medical Records, Review of Additional Materials, additional office consultation

  • $750
  • $2500

Independent Medical Examination:

Independent Medical Examination with written report

  • Per Hour: $1500

Deposition in office:

Deposition: Discovery/Evidence

  • First two hours: $2500
  • For each Additional hour or any portion thereof: $1000
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled disposition): $3500
  • Cancellation fee (less than 7 days notice): $2500

Trial (InState):

  • Initial day: $9000
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $4500
  • For each additional day: $7500
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $2500
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled trial): $9000

Trial (Out of State):

  • Initial day: $9000
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $4500
  • For each additional day: $7500
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $2500
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled trial): $9000

Case Responses

Cataract surgery with no cataracts? (Case #317)

  • Medical Probability: 5 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: The documentation of "mild nuclear sclerosis" indicates that the physician did notice some early cataract formation. Nuclear sclerosis is the aging type of cataracts, and can often be seen in patient...
  • Causation Probability: 5 / 10
  • Causation Summary: The surgery performed could be a cause of injury, but that is a known risk of surgery. If informed consent was obtained, and the patient understood the risk of surgery, then it would be unlikely that...
  • Expert Summary: I have performed over 20,000 vision correction surgeries. I specialize in Refractive Lens Exchange and evaluate patients daily who are asking for glasses independence, very similar to the patient des...
  • Similar Summary: I encounter several patients daily who are being evaluated for glasses independence and are in the 40 - 60 age range. I often perform lens replacement on these patients with excellent results. The p...

Loss of vision post corneal transplant (from donor) and Endophthalmitis, bacterial infection. (Case #382)

  • Medical Probability: 6 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: As a cornea surgeon, I am concerned about the two main items. Obviously, the mishandling of the prepared tissue on the back table needs to be explored further. The explanation that the anterior port...
  • Causation Probability: 6 / 10
  • Causation Summary: This case sounds like endophthalmitis following DSAEK surgery for endothelial dystrophy. This is usually a very successful surgery, but does have the risk of infection. However, the possible contami...
  • Expert Summary: Cornea Fellowship trained, performed about one hundred DSAEK procedures.
  • Similar Summary: DSAEK has been the most popular cornea transplant procedure over the past decade. While I no longer perform the procedure, its "sister" procedure (DMEK) has taken over the bulk of the cornea transpla...

71yo F with cataract implantation, provider placed 2 different IOL model lenses. Forced to re-implant for "wrong" one and now PC has failing vision. (Case #423)

  • Medical Probability: 7 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Unfortunate case, but should be easily resolved. Of course, we have limited chart notes here. It appears that the original lens selection was a multifocal IOL (Panoptix), that was then subsequently ...
  • Causation Probability: 8 / 10
  • Causation Summary: System procedure failure with patient IOL selection change. Hard to tell if medical error with regard to surgery itself.
  • Expert Summary: I am a Refractive Cataract Surgeon, practicing for 25 years, implanting hundreds of multifocal lens implants every year. My preferred lens choice for patients is the Panoptix. I have been using the ...
  • Similar Summary: Fortunately, we use a software system that does not eliminate wrong lens problems, but significantly reduces the chances of this happening. We have had to do lens exchanges over my 25 year career, bu...

Delayed Diagnosis of Retinal Detachment/Tear (Case #427)

  • Medical Probability: 5 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: I believe the first MD should have had a little closer follow up for the patient following his initial exam. The "cloudy vision with black spots" complaint is very normal. It sounds like a normal ex...
  • Causation Probability: 4 / 10
  • Causation Summary: RD symptoms were discussed, exam was normal, aside from PVD, with good vision. It is possible he missed a retinal tear, but hard to say without finding of blood in vitreous. These types of patie...
  • Expert Summary: General ophthalmologist for 24 years, busy practice, seeing 50-100 patients per day. These symptoms are very common, and aside from an earlier f/u (which would have missed the RD as well), I would h...
  • Similar Summary: Blurred vision with floaters are a daily occurrence. Very rarely do they turn into an RD.

Cataract procedure, IOL placed with known cortical material not fully removed. (Case #460)

  • Medical Probability: 5 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: The decision to perform cataract surgery on a mature cataract (needing trypan blue) in a patient with small pupil is a difficult one. While pupil expansion devices (Malyugin ring, etc) often make the...
  • Causation Probability: 4 / 10
  • Causation Summary: we really need much more information to make a decision about causation. Residual cortical material in itself is not typically met with such a tumultuous course. I do not believe the cortical materi...
  • Expert Summary: 25 years of premium cataract surgery, performing over 20,000 cases. Practiced with several retina surgeons who performed PPV/lensectomy surgeries. they also were very comfortable performing PPV with...
  • Similar Summary: Small pupil cases are routine. With the use of flomax in many senior male patients, we are very aggressive with pupil management. With that being said, residual cortex is not an unheard of result. ...

Our Fees

Attorneys:

  • Two preliminary opinions on a case: $400
  • Three preliminary opinions on a case: $500
  • Introduction to a physician through our platform: $500
  • Direct introduction to a physician without a case posting: $1000
    • Please reach out to: somer.saour@kalivar.com

Contact Us

Have a question about Kalivar?

Please email us at admin@kalivar.com

We look forward to hearing from you!

About Us

Kalivar represents a new concept in medical-legal consulting.

Kalivar was founded by two physicians and a lawyer who believe that the medical legal industry deserves an upgrade.

The current state of affairs:

  • Not infrequently doctors are unjustly accused of negligence. At the same time, malpractice victims do not always receive the compensation they deserve.
  • Many doctors are reluctant to serve as an expert witness and do not have time for extensive reviews of medical records. Choosing sides in a dispute between a patient and a peer may be uncomfortable, especially when doctors be deposed or required to provide testimony.
  • The few doctors who serve as expert witnesses often charge high fees to attorneys for an initial opinion. As a result, many attorneys, whether they are representing the plaintiff or the defendant, tend to rely on the opinion of a single expert as the foundation for their case. When that single initial opinion is questionable, significant funds are incurred unnecessarily in legal cases that should never have been initiated, or that instead should have settled immediately.

There is a better way.

We have created an on-line community where doctors can provide anonymous opinions on medical cases, and have the opportunity to be retained as an expert.

Kalivar allows doctors to provide unbiased opinions, as we do not disclose their identity, and we are unaware of whether an opinion is being requested by a defendant or a plaintiff. With only a short event summary to read, busy clinicians can find a few minutes during their day to leave a comment in our social media-like platform (and potentially be compensated for their time!).

Kalivar allows attorneys to obtain diverse opinions from different experts across multiple specialties, for very limited costs. Attorneys will have greater insight into a case before embarking on a long and expensive process that may be unnecessary to begin with.

We hope that you will help us improve the medical-legal industry and join the Kalivar community.

Thank you for your help!

The Kalivar Team: Mark, Paul, Meir

Sign Up



The Captcha image
Reload Image

Note: We only use your last name and NPI number to verify your credentials and make sure you are qualified to provide opinions on Kalivar. We do not share this information with any third party.

Login

Logo

An interactive forum for medical legal cases

Terms of Use Privacy Policy