• How Kalivar Works
  • Our Fees
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Login
  • Sign Up

Expert Information

Currently engaged in clinical practice: Yes

Degree: MD

Specialty / Subspecialty:

  • Family Medicine

Area of Expertise: Primary Care, Diabetes, Anticoagulation in primary care

Year of Medical Training Completion: 1997

City of Practice: San Antonio

State of Practice: Texas

Previous Experience As Expert Witness: Yes

Type of Practice: Non-Academic

  • Deposition(s) Given For the Defendant: 1
  • Deposition(s) Given For the Plaintiff: 20
  • Testified in a Trial For the Defendent:
  • Testified in a Trial For the Plaintiff: 5

Available to Review Cases: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Available to Be Deposed: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Available to Testify In Trial: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Training and Additional Credentials

Medical School: University of Texas HSC - San Antonio

Year of Completion: 1994

Residency: Texas Tech UHSC - El Paso

Year of Completion: 1997

Fellowship: -

Year of Completion: -

Academic / Leadership Information

Highest Academic/Leadership Position Achieved: Clinical Associate Professor

Current Academic Affiliation: University of the Incarnate Word School of Osteopathic Medicine

Distinguishing Achievements

Awards: -

Number of Publications on PubMed: -

Professional Organizations: -

Fee Schedule

Medical Record Review:

Review of Medical Records, Review of Additional Materials, additional office consultation

  • $450
  • $1400

Independent Medical Examination:

Independent Medical Examination with written report

  • Per Hour: -

Deposition in office:

Deposition: Discovery/Evidence

  • First two hours: $900
  • For each Additional hour or any portion thereof: $450
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled disposition): $450
  • Cancellation fee (less than 7 days notice): $450

Trial (InState):

  • Initial day: $6000
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $2500
  • For each additional day: $5000
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $2000
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled trial): $2500

Trial (Out of State):

  • Initial day: $6000
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $2500
  • For each additional day: $5000
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $2000
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled trial): $2500

Case Responses

An infant with vomiting and bloody diarrhea (Case #255)

  • Medical Probability: 10 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Given the patient's symptoms, the evaluation was inadequate. Bloody diarrhea in an infant should have been evaluated further. The initial description of the case stated that an exam was not done. If t...
  • Causation Probability: 9 / 10
  • Causation Summary: The lack of additional evaluation likely led to a missed diagnosis. The discharge directions, as presented do not provide a list of reasons to return to the emergency department.
  • Expert Summary: I am not a great expert because I have not cared for pediatric patients for many years. It is obvious from the description of the case that a deviation of the standard of care took place and was likel...
  • Similar Summary: Never. In my current practice, I do not see infants. The youngest patient I see is 14 years old. I have cared for infants in the past, but it has been years.

Delay in diagnosis/treatment of acute appendicitis (Case #299)

  • Medical Probability: 9 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Patient described classic symptoms of acute appendicitis. Given patient’s age, an ovarian etiology is much less likely. A physical exam in office would have likely been consistent with acute appendi...
  • Causation Probability: 8 / 10
  • Causation Summary: Delay in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis likely led to the perforation and need for the extensive surgery.
  • Expert Summary: I’ve been practicing family medicine for over 25 years in outpatient and urgent care settings. Evaluation and treatment of abdominal pain is a common complaint in most outpatient settings.
  • Similar Summary: This is relatively uncommon, but when patients present with right lower quadrant pain, one of the top three considerations should be acute appendicitis.

Death After Bowel Obstruction (Case #345)

  • Medical Probability: 9 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Given the episodes of projectile vomiting, further evaluation should have begun with the first episode. The presence of bowel movements does not rule-out bowel obstruction, nor does bowel sounds. Ther...
  • Causation Probability: 10 / 10
  • Causation Summary: The bowel obstruction clearly led to this patient’s death.
  • Expert Summary: I testified in a similar case earlier this year. That case was a post-operative case at a skilled nursing facility.
  • Similar Summary: I do not work in LTC facilities at this time. However, I do see patient in my office with similar histories and risk factors for bowel obstruction.

Young male primary MD gives colon cancer screening kit, he is not notified of positive results until 19 months later. Now has stage 3 cancer. (Case #375)

  • Medical Probability: 10 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Failure to report/discuss positive results is a deviation from the standard of care. Practices should have processes in place to identify and locate outstanding test results.
  • Causation Probability: 10 / 10
  • Causation Summary: Given the initial positive test, more likely than not, he had a lesion at the time of the first screening test.
  • Expert Summary: I have been in practice for over 25 years and regularly order colon cancer screening tests for my patients. I don’t use Cologard often but test for occult blood with stool studies for low risk patie...
  • Similar Summary: I order colon cancer screening on a daily basis and manage the results effectively.

Failure to Diagnose and Inform of Tongue Cancer (Case #425)

  • Medical Probability: 10 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Failure to act on an obviously abnormal study is a deviation from the standard of care. Primary care physicians are responsible for the care of their patients and studies ordered from their office and...
  • Causation Probability: 10 / 10
  • Causation Summary: Failure to act for 3 years after an abnormal study will result in additional harm to the patient.
  • Expert Summary: I have extensive experience in primary care expert witness work. I see patients like this regularly.
  • Similar Summary: I’ve diagnosed a number of patients with head and neck cancers.

**Req Family Medicine who works as ER provider** 25yo F possible missed post-c-section infection, abnormal CT. (Case #471)

  • Medical Probability: 9 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: The abnormal findings on the CT warranted close follow-up. Failure allowed the infectious process to progress.
  • Causation Probability: 9 / 10
  • Causation Summary: It appears that infection was present on presentation to the ER in December. Failure to adequately address the issue resulted in progression.
  • Expert Summary: I am not a good choice for this case because I do not work in an ER.
  • Similar Summary: Rarely. I see primarily geriatric patients and adults outside of child bearing age.

Our Fees

Attorneys:

  • Two preliminary opinions on a case: $400
  • Three preliminary opinions on a case: $500
  • Introduction to a physician through our platform: $500
  • Direct introduction to a physician without a case posting: $1000
    • Please reach out to: somer.saour@kalivar.com

Contact Us

Have a question about Kalivar?

Please email us at admin@kalivar.com

We look forward to hearing from you!

About Us

Kalivar represents a new concept in medical-legal consulting.

Kalivar was founded by two physicians and a lawyer who believe that the medical legal industry deserves an upgrade.

The current state of affairs:

  • Not infrequently doctors are unjustly accused of negligence. At the same time, malpractice victims do not always receive the compensation they deserve.
  • Many doctors are reluctant to serve as an expert witness and do not have time for extensive reviews of medical records. Choosing sides in a dispute between a patient and a peer may be uncomfortable, especially when doctors be deposed or required to provide testimony.
  • The few doctors who serve as expert witnesses often charge high fees to attorneys for an initial opinion. As a result, many attorneys, whether they are representing the plaintiff or the defendant, tend to rely on the opinion of a single expert as the foundation for their case. When that single initial opinion is questionable, significant funds are incurred unnecessarily in legal cases that should never have been initiated, or that instead should have settled immediately.

There is a better way.

We have created an on-line community where doctors can provide anonymous opinions on medical cases, and have the opportunity to be retained as an expert.

Kalivar allows doctors to provide unbiased opinions, as we do not disclose their identity, and we are unaware of whether an opinion is being requested by a defendant or a plaintiff. With only a short event summary to read, busy clinicians can find a few minutes during their day to leave a comment in our social media-like platform (and potentially be compensated for their time!).

Kalivar allows attorneys to obtain diverse opinions from different experts across multiple specialties, for very limited costs. Attorneys will have greater insight into a case before embarking on a long and expensive process that may be unnecessary to begin with.

We hope that you will help us improve the medical-legal industry and join the Kalivar community.

Thank you for your help!

The Kalivar Team: Mark, Paul, Meir

Sign Up



The Captcha image
Reload Image

Note: We only use your last name and NPI number to verify your credentials and make sure you are qualified to provide opinions on Kalivar. We do not share this information with any third party.

Login

Logo

An interactive forum for medical legal cases

Terms of Use Privacy Policy