• How Kalivar Works
  • Our Fees
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Login
  • Sign Up

Expert Information

Currently engaged in clinical practice: Yes

Degree: MD

Specialty / Subspecialty:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology  -  Gynecologic Oncology

Area of Expertise: Gynecological Oncology, Gynecological Oncology

Year of Medical Training Completion: 1996

City of Practice: MANHASSET

State of Practice: New York

Previous Experience As Expert Witness: Yes

Type of Practice: Academic

  • Deposition(s) Given For the Defendant: 3
  • Deposition(s) Given For the Plaintiff: 1
  • Testified in a Trial For the Defendent: 2
  • Testified in a Trial For the Plaintiff: 1

Available to Review Cases: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Available to Be Deposed: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Available to Testify In Trial: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Training and Additional Credentials

Medical School: NYU

Year of Completion: 1989

Residency: Penn

Year of Completion: 1993

Fellowship: Penn

Year of Completion: 1995

Academic / Leadership Information

Highest Academic/Leadership Position Achieved: MD

Current Academic Affiliation: Hofstra

Distinguishing Achievements

Awards: Multiple

Number of Publications on PubMed: 20

Professional Organizations: SGO, ACS, acog

Fee Schedule

Medical Record Review:

Review of Medical Records, Review of Additional Materials, additional office consultation

  • $500
  • $7500

Independent Medical Examination:

Independent Medical Examination with written report

  • Per Hour: -

Deposition in office:

Deposition: Discovery/Evidence

  • First two hours: -
  • For each Additional hour or any portion thereof: -
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled disposition): -
  • Cancellation fee (less than 7 days notice): -

Trial (InState):

  • Initial day: -
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): -
  • For each additional day: -
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): -
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled trial): -

Trial (Out of State):

  • Initial day: -
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): -
  • For each additional day: -
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): -
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled trial): -

Case Responses

Young woman with pelvic mass, rupture during removal, multiple complications. (Case #435)

  • Medical Probability: 7 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Based on the available information, it is not clear how suspicious the providers were of a potential malignancy. This could have been assessed preoperatively with tumor markers. In the absence of reas...
  • Causation Probability: 7 / 10
  • Causation Summary: Depending upon the preoperative extent of disease evaluation, one could hypothesize that the metastatic disease might be related to the intraoperative rupture and seeding of the perineal cavity.
  • Expert Summary: My training and expertise are aligned with the nature of this case.
  • Similar Summary: The pathology is uncommon, but this is the type of case if you want oncologist would tend to see.

Client believes untreated placenta accreta resulted in her requiring a hysterectomy. (Case #507)

  • Medical Probability: 4 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: A non uncommon clinical occurrence Pathology from the uterus would be critical to review
  • Causation Probability: 4 / 10
  • Causation Summary: See above comment. The pathology is needed.
  • Expert Summary: I am a board certified OBGYN and Gyn oncologist An obstetrician should also review it
  • Similar Summary: See above. As a Gyn Onc I get called in for these cases.

8-month delay in diagnosing carcinoid tumor of the ovary/fallopian tube (Case #545)

  • Medical Probability: 8 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Based upon the information in the narrative, it seems like surgical intervention would have been prudent and likely would have led to an identification of the nature of the mass. This may have prevent...
  • Causation Probability: 8 / 10
  • Causation Summary: Same responses as above. Based upon the information in the narrative, it seems like surgical intervention would have been prudent and likely would have led to an identification of the nature of th...
  • Expert Summary: I am a board certified Gyn Oncologist with more than 3 decades of clinical experience.
  • Similar Summary: Such tumors are uncommon. I currently care for 2 patients with this type of tumor and have seen others.

Robotic Hysterectomy Injury (Case #548)

  • Medical Probability: 4 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Based on the information provided, the patient experienced postoperative bleeding, which is a known potential complication of this procedure. Day of surgery discharge is not uncommon. Percutaneous dr...
  • Causation Probability: 5 / 10
  • Causation Summary: As stated above, based only on the information provided, I think further determination is not possible. The patient suffered postoperative bleeding and hematoma formation, which is a known complicatio...
  • Expert Summary: I’m a gynecological oncologist who performs hysterectomy and robotic surgery.
  • Similar Summary: Postoperative bleeding is uncommon, but not rare. I am very familiar with these circumstances.

Our Fees

Attorneys:

  • Two preliminary opinions on a case: $400
  • Three preliminary opinions on a case: $500
  • Introduction to a physician through our platform: $500
  • Direct introduction to a physician without a case posting: $1000
    • Please reach out to: somer.saour@kalivar.com

Contact Us

Have a question about Kalivar?

Please email us at admin@kalivar.com

We look forward to hearing from you!

About Us

Kalivar represents a new concept in medical-legal consulting.

Kalivar was founded by two physicians and a lawyer who believe that the medical legal industry deserves an upgrade.

The current state of affairs:

  • Not infrequently doctors are unjustly accused of negligence. At the same time, malpractice victims do not always receive the compensation they deserve.
  • Many doctors are reluctant to serve as an expert witness and do not have time for extensive reviews of medical records. Choosing sides in a dispute between a patient and a peer may be uncomfortable, especially when doctors be deposed or required to provide testimony.
  • The few doctors who serve as expert witnesses often charge high fees to attorneys for an initial opinion. As a result, many attorneys, whether they are representing the plaintiff or the defendant, tend to rely on the opinion of a single expert as the foundation for their case. When that single initial opinion is questionable, significant funds are incurred unnecessarily in legal cases that should never have been initiated, or that instead should have settled immediately.

There is a better way.

We have created an on-line community where doctors can provide anonymous opinions on medical cases, and have the opportunity to be retained as an expert.

Kalivar allows doctors to provide unbiased opinions, as we do not disclose their identity, and we are unaware of whether an opinion is being requested by a defendant or a plaintiff. With only a short event summary to read, busy clinicians can find a few minutes during their day to leave a comment in our social media-like platform (and potentially be compensated for their time!).

Kalivar allows attorneys to obtain diverse opinions from different experts across multiple specialties, for very limited costs. Attorneys will have greater insight into a case before embarking on a long and expensive process that may be unnecessary to begin with.

We hope that you will help us improve the medical-legal industry and join the Kalivar community.

Thank you for your help!

The Kalivar Team: Mark, Paul, Meir

Sign Up



The Captcha image
Reload Image

Note: We only use your last name and NPI number to verify your credentials and make sure you are qualified to provide opinions on Kalivar. We do not share this information with any third party.

Login

Logo

An interactive forum for medical legal cases

Terms of Use Privacy Policy