• How Kalivar Works
  • Our Fees
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Login
  • Sign Up

Expert Information

Currently engaged in clinical practice: Yes

Degree: M.D.

Specialty / Subspecialty:

  • Internal Medicine  -  Cardiovascular Disease
  • Internal Medicine  -  Interventional Cardiology

Area of Expertise: Interventional Cariology, Coronary Stents, Acute myocardial infarction, Cadiogenic Shock, Mechanical Circulatory Support, ECMO, Critical care cardiology

Year of Medical Training Completion: 2015

City of Practice: NEW YORK

State of Practice: New York

Previous Experience As Expert Witness: Yes

Type of Practice: Academic

  • Deposition(s) Given For the Defendant: 1
  • Deposition(s) Given For the Plaintiff: 1
  • Testified in a Trial For the Defendent:
  • Testified in a Trial For the Plaintiff:

Available to Review Cases: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Available to Be Deposed: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Available to Testify In Trial: Yes, for either the defendant or the plaintiff

Training and Additional Credentials

Medical School: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Year of Completion: 2012

Residency: New York Presbyterian Hospital- Columbia

Year of Completion: 2015

Fellowship: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Year of Completion: 2019

Academic / Leadership Information

Highest Academic/Leadership Position Achieved: Director, Mechanical Circulatory Support

Current Academic Affiliation: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Distinguishing Achievements

Awards: SCAI 30 in their 30s, CRT Young Leaders Award, Physician Educator Award, Physician of the Year Award

Number of Publications on PubMed: 11

Professional Organizations: FACC, FSCAI

Fee Schedule

Medical Record Review:

Review of Medical Records, Review of Additional Materials, additional office consultation

  • $500
  • $2500

Independent Medical Examination:

Independent Medical Examination with written report

  • Per Hour: -

Deposition in office:

Deposition: Discovery/Evidence

  • First two hours: $1400
  • For each Additional hour or any portion thereof: $700
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled disposition): -
  • Cancellation fee (less than 7 days notice): -

Trial (InState):

  • Initial day: $8000
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $4000
  • For each additional day: $8000
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $2000
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled trial): -

Trial (Out of State):

  • Initial day: $8000
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $4000
  • For each additional day: $8000
  • Cancellation fee (less than 72 hours notice): $2000
  • Retainer (due 14 days prior to scheduled trial): -

Case Responses

52yo F with previous TAVR, has failed valve and becomes symptomatic. Possible delays with abnormal EKG in office and heart cath, dies following day. (Case #422)

  • Medical Probability: 10 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: With symptoms and this degree of aortic stenosis, urgent treatment was necessary- both medical and surgical
  • Causation Probability: 9 / 10
  • Causation Summary: The cause of death here is either closure of the aortic valve or further embolization into the coronaries. Seeing the cath films would help.
  • Expert Summary: Interventional cardiology, cardiac critical care and inpatient cardiology are my expertise and this case overlap with all of these.
  • Similar Summary: I am the Director of Inpatient Cardiology Service and see similar patients in both the floor and the ICU setting. This is a rare complication but happens once every few months.

Preoperative clearance prior to elective hysterectomy. (Case #429)

  • Medical Probability: 9 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Given the patients blood pressure is 279/114 on insertion of the arterial line- which must be immediately preoperative- it would be against standard of care to send such a patient to the operating roo...
  • Causation Probability: 10 / 10
  • Causation Summary: There is no question whatsoever that the neurologic injury is a direct result of the blood pressure.
  • Expert Summary: I practice both inpatient and outpatient cardiology, including in a critical care setting where I frequently manage blood pressure requiring vasoactive drips such as was done in this case. I also rou...
  • Similar Summary: I routinely evaluate preoperatively for surgery and routinely manage severe hyper or hypo tension. This though is a very rare case mostly because of the description of being unable to take additional...

Patient did well after surgery. 3 days later CT showed massive aspiration. Plastic found in left bronchi. Died two weeks later of hypoxic respiratory failure. (Case #458)

  • Medical Probability: 7 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: The plastic debris in the airway could only have been introduced by health care provider.
  • Causation Probability: 8 / 10
  • Causation Summary: This led to a cascade of events including reintubation, malnutrition, etc
  • Expert Summary: I routinely practice in the ICU as a cardiac critical care specialist
  • Similar Summary: this is a common case to an icu

Procedural complication resulting in cardiac arrest from a cardiac perforation (Case #490)

  • Medical Probability: 9 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Need to see xray images and equipment used. Perforation is caused by biopsying the wrong wall of the heart which is likely what was done here.
  • Causation Probability: 10 / 10
  • Causation Summary: Its clear that the perforation resulted in cardiac arrest from tamponade.
  • Expert Summary: I specialize in interventional heart failure and routinely perform endomyocardial biopsies including for amyloid (ie > 300 biopsies per year).
  • Similar Summary: Catastrophic complication from biopsy is rare. But biopsy and evaluation for complication and management of complication is something I do often (ie weekly).

Cardiac arrest during elective outpatient ablation for a-fib. (Case #505)

  • Medical Probability: 6 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: With new symptoms of heart failure, it would be standard of care to evaluate the ejection fraction prior to general anesthesia.
  • Causation Probability: 6 / 10
  • Causation Summary: Need more information as to the clinical course after the cardiovascular collapse including details of the cath and outcome.
  • Expert Summary: I routinely 1) evaluate and optimize patients prior to general anesthesia and clear them 2) manage cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest as a complication of anesthesia/percutaneous cardiac procedures
  • Similar Summary: Yes both in the preprocedural assessment and following the complication. Please note I do not perform atrial fibrillation ablations though do not find this experience necessarily relevant to this cas...

F/T diagnose and treat myocarditis in a 17-year-old resulting in severe heart dysfunction with a subsequent heart transplant (Case #532)

  • Medical Probability: 7 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: The key in answering this is scrutiny of the 1/13 visit to the ER.
  • Causation Probability: 9 / 10
  • Causation Summary: Should there have been deviation from standard of care during the 1/13 visit, then there is definite causality.
  • Expert Summary: My specialty is cardiogenic shock and use of mechanical circulatory support - like ECMO- for the sickest subgroup of patients.
  • Similar Summary: On a daily basis as this is my specific specialty.

Cardiology Plan of Care (Case #567)

  • Medical Probability: 8 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: There should be close review of the EKGs. There was such incredible coronary disease with two being 100% occluded that it is hard to imagine there were not ST elevations or other criteria that would ...
  • Causation Probability: 8 / 10
  • Causation Summary: The extent of coronary disease here was very significant and peripheral arterial disease may have limited options even if taken to the cath lab sooner. However, "no revascularization achievable" is v...
  • Expert Summary: I am an interventional cardiologist with a specialty in STEMI and cardiogenic shock requiring mechanical circulatory support (ie Impella CP).
  • Similar Summary: Several times per week as this is my specific clinical specialty.

Potential negligence in the management of cardiogenic shock (Case #572)

  • Medical Probability: 9 / 10
  • Medical Error Summary: Rhythm control is preferred over rate control for atrial flutter in general but especially in heart failure. More importantly, the choice of IV diltiazem was one that is contraindicated and almost ce...
  • Causation Probability: 10 / 10
  • Causation Summary: Yes. If upon review of the records it was clear that diltiazem was initiated or continued inappropriately there is definite causation.
  • Expert Summary: I am the director of the inpatient cardiology resident service with a specific specialty in the management of cardiogenic shock.
  • Similar Summary: I see cases like this daily both taking care of them from admission, but also being called for the management of shock and insertion of MCS if it reaches the point it did here in this case.

Our Fees

Attorneys:

  • Two preliminary opinions on a case: $400
  • Three preliminary opinions on a case: $500
  • Introduction to a physician through our platform: $500
  • Direct introduction to a physician without a case posting: $1000
    • Please reach out to: somer.saour@kalivar.com

Contact Us

Have a question about Kalivar?

Please email us at admin@kalivar.com

We look forward to hearing from you!

About Us

Kalivar represents a new concept in medical-legal consulting.

Kalivar was founded by two physicians and a lawyer who believe that the medical legal industry deserves an upgrade.

The current state of affairs:

  • Not infrequently doctors are unjustly accused of negligence. At the same time, malpractice victims do not always receive the compensation they deserve.
  • Many doctors are reluctant to serve as an expert witness and do not have time for extensive reviews of medical records. Choosing sides in a dispute between a patient and a peer may be uncomfortable, especially when doctors be deposed or required to provide testimony.
  • The few doctors who serve as expert witnesses often charge high fees to attorneys for an initial opinion. As a result, many attorneys, whether they are representing the plaintiff or the defendant, tend to rely on the opinion of a single expert as the foundation for their case. When that single initial opinion is questionable, significant funds are incurred unnecessarily in legal cases that should never have been initiated, or that instead should have settled immediately.

There is a better way.

We have created an on-line community where doctors can provide anonymous opinions on medical cases, and have the opportunity to be retained as an expert.

Kalivar allows doctors to provide unbiased opinions, as we do not disclose their identity, and we are unaware of whether an opinion is being requested by a defendant or a plaintiff. With only a short event summary to read, busy clinicians can find a few minutes during their day to leave a comment in our social media-like platform (and potentially be compensated for their time!).

Kalivar allows attorneys to obtain diverse opinions from different experts across multiple specialties, for very limited costs. Attorneys will have greater insight into a case before embarking on a long and expensive process that may be unnecessary to begin with.

We hope that you will help us improve the medical-legal industry and join the Kalivar community.

Thank you for your help!

The Kalivar Team: Mark, Paul, Meir

Sign Up



The Captcha image
Reload Image

Note: We only use your last name and NPI number to verify your credentials and make sure you are qualified to provide opinions on Kalivar. We do not share this information with any third party.

Login

Logo

An interactive forum for medical legal cases

Terms of Use Privacy Policy