Comprehensive Summary
Client is a 60-year-old male with a history of hypertension, pulmonary embolism, DVT (previously on Eliquis), hypothyroidism, and prior cholecystectomy, presented to the Free-Standing Emergency Department (FSED) with sudden-onset epigastric pain radiating to the back, rated 10/10, accompanied by nausea and diaphoresis.
Client's care spans a 33-day catastrophic hospitalization that began with what appeared to be an isolated severe pancreatitis presentation and escalated into one of the most complicated acute surgical courses reflected in the available records.
Presentation (02/12): The client arrived at the FSED in apparent stability despite a lipase of 59,979 — nearly 200× the upper limit of normal — and hematocrit of 55.6%, both of which are established markers of severe, high-risk pancreatitis. Neither the FSED nor the hospital admission utilized standardized severity scoring tools (BISAP, Ranson, APACHE II). Resuscitation was initiated with Normal Saline rather than Lactated Ringer's (inconsistent with ACG 2024 conditional recommendations), and the volume delivered was inadequate — evidenced by the hematocrit rising further to 57.7% on 02/13 despite 5+ liters of IVF. The patient was admitted to the floor rather than the ICU.
Early Deterioration at Hospital (02/12–02/15): GI consultation was not obtained until more than 24 hours after presentation. Surgical consultation was not obtained until 02/14, at which point multi-organ failure was already developing. By 02/15, the patient required emergency intubation, and emergent decompressive laparotomy was performed for frank abdominal compartment syndrome with hemorrhagic ascites. The discharge summary explicitly documents that the need to transfer to other hospital was driven in part by nephrology's refusal to see new consults on weekends — a documented institutional failure directly implicating the hospital-level operational policies.
ICU Course (02/15–03/17): The client spent 30 days in the Main ICU at Transfer Hospital. His course was marked by:
• Acute necrotizing pancreatitis requiring 9 surgical procedures over 24 days (plus the initial laparotomy at Hospital), including 3 formal necrosectomies, multiple staged re-explorations, abdominal washouts, drain placements, and placement of a Stamm gastrojejunostomy tube for enteral access
• Abdominal compartment syndrome with open abdomen managed with ABThera wound vac for the majority of the ICU stay
• ARDS documented from approximately 02/19–02/20, requiring dexamethasone, invasive mechanical ventilation, and serial ventilator weaning trials (consistently failing SBT through late February due to PEEP >7.5, FiO₂ >50%, sedation, and hemodynamic instability)
• Oliguric acute renal failure with creatinine peak of 5.37 mg/dL, requiring CRRT (CVVHDF modality) and later intermittent HD, before recovering to non-oliguric ARF by 03/12
• Percutaneous tracheostomy placed 02/28 due to inability to wean from mechanical ventilation
• Leukemoid reaction with WBC peaking at 31,000–33,000, fluctuating throughout with surgical debridements, managed with broad-spectrum antimicrobials (cefepime, vancomycin, metronidazole, micafungin)
• Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) caused by MSSA, confirmed by bronchoscopy/BAL on 03/07
• Administrative cancellation of physician-ordered blood cultures on 02/21 by Infection Control — repeatedly flagged by ID consultants through 03/09 as clinically unacceptable during active ARDS/VAP/leukocytosis workup
Recovery Phase (03/11–03/17): Following final abdominal closure on 03/11, The Client demonstrated meaningful recovery. Sequential drain removal was completed by 03/15. Renal function recovered. Trach was downsized and the patient tolerated a speaking valve by 03/16. He passed a Modified Barium Swallow Study on 03/17 and was discharged to LTAC (Select Specialty) on the same day.
Files:
No questions yet!
Do you believe there might have been medical error?
Not appreciating that a lipase level of over 59000 and a Hct of 55 are consistent with acute pancreatitis. No use of recommended Lactated Ringers solution. Inadequate volume resuscitation. Failure to get an urgent GI consult. Failure to get an urgent surgery consult. Failure to have Nephrology available on the weekend. Failure to allow blood cultures to be obtained.
Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?
The lack of appropriate volume resuscitation along with failure to get urgent GI,Surgery and Nephrology consults resulted in multi organ compromise.
What makes you a good expert for this case?
I have reviewed over 60 medical malpractice cases over the past 13 years and am well aware of medical negligence/ medical malpractice.
How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?
Thankfully nothing this extreme has been seen in my practice.
Do you believe there might have been medical error?
I am a cardiologist , I dont think this case is proper for me
Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?
I am a cardiologist , I dont think this case is proper for me
What makes you a good expert for this case?
I am not the right expert for this case
How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?
I am not the right expert for this case
Do you believe there might have been medical error?
Acute pancreatitis has a broad spectrum of disease severity that can defy clinical predictor models, but there are fundamental common sense practices that are universal. Without access to primary source clinical data it would be hard to specifically opine. On the matter of volume resuscitation, lactated Ringer's (LR) is the preferred crystalloid over normal saline (NS) for volume resuscitation in acute pancreatitis, though this is a conditional recommendation based on low-quality evidence. The lack of a nephrology consult service is however troublesome. While it’s not clear that early intervention would have altered the course, appropriate monitoring is key and again is fairly standardized, not to mention the ability to transfer to higher level of care if need be.
Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?
Acute pancreatitis has a broad spectrum of disease severity that can defy clinical predictor models, but there are fundamental common sense practices that are universal. Without access to primary source clinical data it would be hard to specifically opine. On the matter of volume resuscitation, lactated Ringer's (LR) is the preferred crystalloid over normal saline (NS) for volume resuscitation in acute pancreatitis, though this is a conditional recommendation based on low-quality evidence. The lack of a nephrology consult service is however troublesome. While it’s not clear that early intervention would have altered the course, appropriate monitoring is key and again is fairly standardized, not to mention the ability to transfer to higher level of care if need be.
What makes you a good expert for this case?
20 years of experience as a practicing gastroenterologist at an academic teaching hospital, including inpatient inpatient management of acute and chronic pancreatitis
How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?
Cases of this severity come up a few times each year
Do you believe there might have been medical error?
My main concern in reading this, from the lens of being a critical care physician, is the failure to appropriately risk stratify the patient. Such delays create harder to manage cases, as evident by this patient. In addition, the lack of blood cultures while the patient had ARDS is of concern for reasons I'll share below.
Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?
Failure to risk stratify results in poor management of a patient's clinical phenotype and delay of care. That is what we saw in this case where the patient was not appropriately risk stratified, then under-treated. In addition, the lack of daily blood cultures is a concern given the patient is on high dose steroids and would blunt fevers, as well as causing elevated white blood cell counts. For critical care physicians, we would use daily blood cultures to monitor for infections as the systemic inflammatory responses would be confounded.
What makes you a good expert for this case?
I'm a critical care physician that practices in medical ICUs, oncology ICUs, and consults in surgical ICUs.
How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?
Often. Again, this patient could easily have been one in my ICU.
Do you believe there might have been medical error?
I believe this patient showed signs of severe disease from the beginning so should have been monitored very closely in an ICU setting (volume status, I/O, Hct, kidney Fxn and intravascular volume which is hard to monitor without a Foley or some intravascular monitor). Type of fluid and amount of fluid to be used is important and imaging monitoring.
Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?
Intensive early monitoring and anticipation of serious adverse events was warranted from the beginning.
What makes you a good expert for this case?
20+ years of pancreatology and advanced endoscopy, Director of one of the largest pancreas units in the country and Professor of medicine with tenure with experience in legal case reviews.
How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?
we trate patients with severe complicated pancreatitis on weekly to every other week basis and have the full spectrum of support services needed (surgery endoscopy ICU nutrition support... etc)
Do you believe there might have been medical error?
There appear to be a few medical errors, such as insufficient monitoring on a general ward vs ICU, due to the lack of correct severity assessment. Chart review could explain better why the Htc increased despite 5+ L given. The cancellation of cultures could also have impacted management and outcomes. And delayed HD could have worsened pulmonary edema and prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?
The course appears typical of severe pancreatitis, which oftentimes evolves in this way despite optimal management. Some of the issues pointed out, such as using NS instead of LR, are unlikely to have changed outcomes. The questions that need to be explored more deeply to get a sounder opinion are whether insufficient fluids were given on the first (and most critical)day and why (was it because he was on the floor with poor monitoring?), and, most importantly, whether abdominal compartment syndrome was missed early in the course. Other issues with dialysis and cultures could also have some influence on outcomes.
What makes you a good expert for this case?
I have been a critical care specialist for 25 years and have been practicing surgical critical care for 16 years, giving me a unique positioning amongst intensivists to understand surgical indications and abdominal compartment syndrome and its management
How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?
Although pancreatitis of this severity is rare overall, given my practice in surgical critical care, I may see a concentrated amount of these cases, roughly 5-7 /year, between my SICU and MICU practices.
Do you believe there might have been medical error?
Not calling the consultants with a severe pancreatitis by level of lipase and also patient was hemoconcentrated by the hematocrit levels, requiring higher level of care such as ICU.
Do you believe there might have been causation (i.e. the medical error resulted in an injury)?
Pancreatitis has unexpected results but at the end they call for consultants so difficult to say there was a causation to cause injury because they did call consultants at some point.
What makes you a good expert for this case?
15 years expereince in care of nosocomial infections and ICU/ID care.
How often do you encounter cases similar to this one in your practice?
Once a month we see cases like this.
Want to open a case or submit response?
Comments are accepted only from Internal Medicine - includes all subspecialties experts.